decision — Lattice component

decision

ComparisonCanvasStructure

The verdict slide — one chosen path, named explicitly.

Open in Playground
Variant

Use after a comparison slide to land the decision. The justifications render as one unified categorical strip — co-equal cards that together signal a single resolved verdict; the heading carries the decision, not a focal/subordinated split.

recommendationtradeoffstrategy

When to use

  • Land the verdict. Follows a comparison slide to make the chosen path unambiguous. The heading carries the verb of the decision; the cards substantiate it.
  • Two to four justifications. Each card is one short rationale — the chosen path first, then a Why-not card for each rejected alternative. More than four crowds the horizontal strip.
  • After the comparison. Pair with compare-prose or split-compare upstream — that slide does the weighing, this slide lands the answer. Reaching for decision without a prior comparison reads as edict.

When not to use

  • No clear chosen path. If the cards don't resolve to a single verdict, the slide is back to being a comparison. Use compare-prose or split-compare; reserve decision for the resolved call.
  • Long body per card. Each card is one sentence of rationale. Paragraphs belong on the comparison slide upstream, not on the verdict slide.
  • Generic heading. The h2 carries the decision verb — Build, not buy. Adopt the framework. Pause the rollout. A heading like Next steps wastes the focal real estate.

Common mistakes

  • Reordering justification cards, expecting their categorical accent color to travel with the same justification. The accent color is assigned purely by card POSITION (an nth-child cycle through the categorical palette), not by content — reordering cards in the markdown reassigns colors; they don't follow the justification.
  • Manually bolding the option name with **…**. The lead text auto-lifts to <strong> (the corner-tag CSS keys off it), and the lift step already skips an already-bolded lead — a manually bolded lead and a plain one produce byte-identical output. Wrapping it yourself is a harmless no-op, not a defect, but it's also unnecessary — write plain text and let the lift handle the weight.

Authoring

<!-- _class: decision -->

## What we are doing.

- Chosen path
  - One-line rationale for the decision.
- Rejected option
  - One-line rationale for why this didn't fit.

Slots

SlotSelectorRequiredDescription
titleh2yesSlide heading framing the decision.
optionsul > liyesList items. Authoring contract: a top-level bullet is the option name (renders bold by default); an indented bullet underneath carries the short rationale. The cards render as a unified strip of co-equal categorical tags; the verdict is carried by the heading, not by emphasizing one card.

Anatomy

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  header                                 │
│            Decision heading.            │
│                                         │
│  ┌─────────┐  ┌─────────┐  ┌─────────┐  │
│  CHOSEN       Option B     Option C     │
│  rationale    rationale    rationale    │
│  └─────────┘  └─────────┘  └─────────┘  │
│                                         │
│  footer                           1/19  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Variant decision rule

  • default (no modifier)The reasoning carries the weight — a quiet corner tag labels each justification without competing with the verdict heading.
  • banner-tagThe camp or stance itself is worth headlining — converts the quiet corner tag into a full-width banner strip per card.

Variants

banner-tagbanner-tag

Headlines each card with its camp.

<!-- _class: decision banner-tag -->

## banner-tag headlines each card with its camp.

- DECIDE
  - The banner carries the stance; the body carries the reason.
- RECORD
  - Use when the slide is the decision log's public face.

Related

  • compare-prosethe comparison slide that should precede decision
  • split-comparecomparison and verdict on one slide instead of two
  • closingthe deck ends without a single-call verdict
  • big-numberthe decision is a quantitative commitment